By Chouraqui, Frank; Merleau-Ponty, Maurice; Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm
This article seeks to contribute to the heritage of contemporary philosophy by way of setting up a structural hyperlink among the ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. it's meant as a scientific exposition of either philosopher's key techniques, in addition to an inquiry at the origins of so-called continental philosophy.
Read or Download Ambiguity and the absolute : Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty on the question of truth PDF
Similar epistemology books
The worth of actual trust has performed a vital function in heritage of philosophy—consider Socrates’ slogan that the unexamined lifestyles isn't really worthy dwelling, and Aristotle’s declare that everybody evidently desires knowledge—as good as in modern epistemology, the place questions about the worth of information have lately taken middle level.
2009 reprint of 1925 variation. this can be a big ebook of 1 thought, yet that concept is a vital one for the social scientist. in response to the writer "many inspiration tactics and notion constructs seem to be consciously fake assumptions, which both contradict fact or are even contradictory in themselves, yet that are deliberately hence shaped so as to triumph over problems of notion via this man made deviation, and succeed in the target of inspiration by way of roundabout methods and by way of paths.
Taking good care of oneself is more and more interpreted as taking good care of one’s mind. except drugs, books, foodstuff, and video games for a greater mind, humans may also use neurotechnologies for self-improvement. This publication explores how using mind units to appreciate or enhance the self alterations people’s subjectivity.
- Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
- Inference to the Best Explanation (International Library of Philosophy)
- Was Heisst Denken
- Pragmatic Reasons: A Defense of Morality and Epistemology
- Truth and Existence
Additional info for Ambiguity and the absolute : Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty on the question of truth
The second argument is related to the structure of the development of both thinkers’ ideas on the question of truth. Even though this is not the central concern of this book, it should be pointed out that not only do their treatments arrive at similar conclusions, but that they do so in a similar way. This is visible from the structure of both developments. From what I have said above, it is apparent that Nietzsche’s and Merleau-Ponty’s treatments of the question of truth are organized around three key ideas.
Here Nietzsche operates a subtle reintegration of truth into his thought. Contrary to his earlier works, which embraced the exaltation provided by illusions, the works of the middle and late period contend that one cannot dispense with a reference to truth. This is a consequence of the very question of truth as it has been deﬁned above: for Nietzsche, truth tells lies (it presents the world as objectively structured and perceptual objects as fully determinate and self-identical), but it is grounded in a certain reality (the “phenomenon” of truth).
Mankind starts taking the original for the copy and the copy for the original. The world thereby established Nietzsche calls—not without irony and quotation marks—the “real world” (WP, ) or the “true world” (TI, ). indb 32 ■ Nietzsche on Self-Diﬀerentiation and Genealogy 10/15/13 8:03:06 AM The Truth of Error Nietzsche spends a considerable amount of eﬀort to uncover this fallacious process and to undercut its oﬀspring. Yet, he spends even more time investigating the disturbing fact that precisely this double faculty exists, that no appeal to a duality of reality and ideality can obliterate the continuity that leads the one into the non-one, transforms the imagined world into the “real world,” “immorality” into “morality” (X ), and the “only world” into the “world of appearance” (WP, ).