By Anthony O'Hear
In keeping with the London Lecture sequence of the Royal Institute of Philosophy for 2006-7, this assortment brings jointly essays from best figures in a quickly constructing box of philosophy. participants contain: Alvin Goldman, Timothy Williamson, Duncan Pritchard, Miranda Fricker, Scott Sturgeon, Jose Zalabardo, and Quassin Casay.
Read or Download Epistemology: Volume 64 (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements) PDF
Best epistemology books
The price of real trust has performed a important position in background of philosophy—consider Socrates’ slogan that the unexamined existence isn't really worthy dwelling, and Aristotle’s declare that everybody evidently wishes knowledge—as good as in modern epistemology, the place questions about the price of information have lately taken middle level.
2009 reprint of 1925 version. this is often a massive ebook of 1 notion, yet that concept is a crucial one for the social scientist. in response to the writer "many concept strategies and concept constructs seem to be consciously fake assumptions, which both contradict truth or are even contradictory in themselves, yet that are deliberately hence shaped so as to triumph over problems of suggestion by means of this synthetic deviation, and achieve the aim of concept by means of roundabout methods and by way of paths.
Taking good care of oneself is more and more interpreted as caring for one’s mind. except drugs, books, nutrition, and video games for a greater mind, humans may also use neurotechnologies for self-improvement. This booklet explores how using mind units to appreciate or enhance the self alterations people’s subjectivity.
- From Abdullah to Hussein: Jordan in Transition (Studies in Middle Eastern History)
- Scepticism and Animal Faith
- Representation and Productive Ambiguity in Mathematics and the Sciences
- Justification and Knowledge: New Studies in Epistemology
- Cognition and Perception: How Do Psychology and Neural Science Inform Philosophy?
Extra info for Epistemology: Volume 64 (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements)
Brogaard 2007. 15 Consider the following remark made by Lipton 2004: 30 and quoted in S. Grimm 2006: 1, for example: “Understanding is not some sort of super-knowledge, but simply more knowledge: knowledge of causes”. e. knowing that it burned down because of (say) faulty wiring. I am grateful to Grimm (2006) for alerting me to some of these references. 31 Duncan Pritchard As we will see, I want to claim that both of these conceptions of understanding are wrong, at least strictly speaking, and that once we get clear on the relationship between understanding and knowledge we can make some progress towards dealing with the problem of epistemic value.
For while one can have understanding while lacking knowledge, it should be clear that understanding requires an intellectual sophistication that is not necessarily demanded by knowledge. One can imagine, for example, an agent knowing a great deal while having very little understanding of anything, but it is hard to imagine the converse. If understanding is a cognitive achievement, something that can only fall short of knowledge when environmental 40 Knowledge, Understanding and Epistemic Value epistemic luck is present, then we have a straightforward explanation for this intuition.
It is easy to see the attraction of such a view, in that understanding does seem to be particularly valuable to us. More speciﬁcally, insofar as knowledge and understanding do indeed come apart, then understanding seems to be preferable to knowledge. As we might be tempted to put the point, we would surely rather understand than merely know. Before we can evaluate a claim of this sort, however, we need to be a little clearer about what we are talking about. One problem that afﬂicts any direct comparison between knowledge and understanding is that knowledge (of the propositional sort that we are concerned with at any rate) is concerned with propositions, whereas understanding usually isn’t, at least not directly.