By Michael Slote
This new ebook by means of Michael Slote argues that Western philosophy most often has overemphasized rational keep an eye on and autonomy on the fee of the $64000 countervailing price and advantage of receptivity. lately the information of worrying and empathy have bought loads of philosophical and public realization, yet either those notions relaxation at the deeper and broader worth of receptivity, and in From Enlightenment to Receptivity, Slote seeks to teach that we have to concentration extra on receptivity if we're to achieve a extra balanced feel and figuring out of what's very important to us.
Beginning with a critique of Enlightenment considering that calls into query its denial of any crucial function to concerns of emotion and empathy, he is going directly to exhibit how a better emphasis on those components and at the receptivity that underlies them may give us a extra life like, balanced, and delicate realizing of our middle moral and epistemological values. this implies rejecting post-modernism's blanket rejection of cause and of compelling genuine values and spotting, fairly, that receptivity may still play a tremendous position in how we lead our lives as members, in how we relate to nature, in how we collect wisdom concerning the international, and in how we relate morally and politically with others.
Read or Download From Enlightenment to Receptivity: Rethinking Our Values PDF
Similar epistemology books
The worth of real trust has performed a primary position in heritage of philosophy—consider Socrates’ slogan that the unexamined existence isn't really worthy residing, and Aristotle’s declare that everybody evidently wishes knowledge—as good as in modern epistemology, the place questions about the worth of information have lately taken heart degree.
2009 reprint of 1925 version. this can be an incredible booklet of 1 notion, yet that concept is an important one for the social scientist. based on the writer "many notion methods and idea constructs seem to be consciously fake assumptions, which both contradict truth or are even contradictory in themselves, yet that are deliberately therefore shaped for you to triumph over problems of suggestion by way of this man made deviation, and succeed in the aim of notion by means of roundabout methods and by means of paths.
Taking good care of oneself is more and more interpreted as caring for one’s mind. except tablets, books, foodstuff, and video games for a greater mind, humans may also use neurotechnologies for self-improvement. This e-book explores how using mind units to appreciate or enhance the self alterations people’s subjectivity.
- What is your dangerous idea
- Philosophy of Perception: A Contemporary Introduction
- Why Things Matter: The Place of Values in Science, Psychoanalysis and Religion
- Evolutionary Epistemology and Its Implications for Humankind
- Handbook of Logic in Computer Science. Volume 4: Semantic Modelling
- The concept of model. An introduction to the materialist epistemology of mathematics
Additional resources for From Enlightenment to Receptivity: Rethinking Our Values
6 A very young child or even a newborn baby can feel distress and start crying at the distress and crying of another child within hearing distance, and this operates via a kind of mimicry and also seems like a form of infusion or, as some like to say, contagion. But as a child develops conceptual/linguistic skills, a richer history of personal experiences, and a fuller sense of the reality of others, a more cognitively “mediated” form of “associative empathy” can be involuntarily aroused in response to situations or experiences that are not immediately present and are merely heard about, remembered, or read about.
Is such a person being open minded? Prett y clearly not. And what seems to be missing is any sort of genuine openness to the possibility that the other person is in some respects correct in his or her opinion, any kind of even minimal sympathy, therefore, with what the other person thinks. So I think real objectivity and open-mindedness require one to have or to be able to acquire a certain degree or amount of sympathy with what others think, and such sympathy clearly means having an at least somewhat favorable opinion of what others think.
And by and large, the Romantic revolution never really affected that kind of philosophy or its immediate intellectual forebears. In a way, that isn’t surprising. Philosophers have long used reason as their tool and have thought of rationality as our most important or essential gift (Aristotle defined humans as rational animals). There is therefore a strong persisting tendency among philosophers in the English-speaking world to accept some of the basic tenets of Enlightenment thought. And since the Enlightenment in many ways saw itself as carrying forward the rationalistic classical thought of ancient Greece and Rome, there has also been a tendency to accept the rationalism that the Greeks saw as grounding both science and morality or ethics.