By Jason Stanley
Jason Stanley provides a startling and provocative declare approximately wisdom: that even if somebody understands a proposition at a given time is partially made up our minds through his or her useful pursuits, i.e. by way of how a lot is at stake for that individual at the moment. In protecting this thesis, Stanley introduces readers to a couple of concepts for resolving philosophical paradox, making the ebook crucial not only for experts in epistemology yet for all philosophers attracted to philosophical technique. when you consider that a couple of his techniques attract linguistic facts, it is going to be of serious curiosity to linguists in addition.
Read or Download Knowledge and Practical Interests (Lines of Thought) PDF
Best epistemology books
The worth of real trust has performed a imperative position in background of philosophy—consider Socrates’ slogan that the unexamined lifestyles isn't worthy residing, and Aristotle’s declare that everybody certainly desires knowledge—as good as in modern epistemology, the place questions on the price of information have lately taken middle level.
2009 reprint of 1925 version. this can be an enormous publication of 1 inspiration, yet that concept is an important one for the social scientist. based on the writer "many suggestion methods and proposal constructs seem to be consciously fake assumptions, which both contradict fact or are even contradictory in themselves, yet that are deliberately therefore shaped so as to triumph over problems of concept through this man made deviation, and achieve the objective of notion by way of roundabout methods and by means of paths.
Caring for oneself is more and more interpreted as caring for one’s mind. except capsules, books, foodstuff, and video games for a greater mind, humans may also use neurotechnologies for self-improvement. This booklet explores how using mind units to appreciate or increase the self alterations people’s subjectivity.
- Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Truth and its Deformities, Volume XXXII
- Mind and Society: Epistemological Essays on Sociology
- Franz Brentano’s Analysis of Truth
- Norms, Naturalism and Epistemology: The case for science without norms
- Mikhaïl Bakhtine. Le principe dialogique. Suivi de : Écrits du Cercle de Bakhtine
Additional resources for Knowledge and Practical Interests (Lines of Thought)
Knowledge Ascriptions and Gradability ~ 39 'better than anyone' is idiomatic. Hannah knows better than three people that she is poor. Hannah knows better than Frank that she is poor. John knows that Bush is president better than Mary does. John knows that Bush is president better than Bill knows that Clinton is a Democrat. In addition, all of my informants reported a strong difference in acceptability between these sentences, on the one hand, and the perfectly acceptable: (i5)(a) John likes Bill more than Mary does.
Contextualists typically tell us, when introducing the thesis, that it would not be at all surprising if predicates such as 'knows that Bush is president' turned out to be context-sensitive in the ways they describe. After all, we are told, many natural language predicates are context-sensitive. g. 'flat', 'bald', 'rich', 'happy', 'sad'.... These are all predicates that can be satisfied to varying degrees and that can also be satisfied simpliciter. , we can talk about one surface being flatter than another and we can talk about a surface being flat simpliciter.
As Keith DeRose (1995: 27-9) has emphasized, utterances of constructions such as the following are particularly infelicitous: (1) John knows that he has hands, but he does not know that he is not a handless brain in a vat. (2) John knows that that is a zebra, but he does not know that that is not a painted mule. But, if RAT is correct, utterances of (i) and (2) express true propositions. Since there is no other obvious source of their infelicity, RAT has inexplicably bad consequences. A contextualist construal of RAT promises to overcome several problems with it.