By J. David Velleman
This e-book brings jointly essays on own identification, autonomy, and ethical feelings by means of the prestigious thinker J. David Velleman. even though all of the essays used to be written as an self sufficient piece, they're unified via an encompassing thesis, that there's no unmarried entity denoted through ''the self,'' in addition to by means of topics from Kantian ethics, psychoanalytic conception, social psychology, and Velleman's paintings within the philosophy of motion. of the essays have been chosen by way of the editors of Philosophers' Annual as being one of the ten top papers of their yr of booklet.
Read or Download Self to Self: Selected Essays PDF
Similar consciousness & thought books
We're fabric beings in a fabric international, yet we're additionally beings who've reviews and emotions. How can those subjective states be only a subject of topic? To guard materialism, philosophical materialists have formulated what's also known as "the phenomenal-concept strategy," which holds that we own quite a number exact ideas for classifying the subjective features of our studies.
What kind of factor is the brain? and the way can this type of factor whilst - belong to the wildlife, - signify the realm, - supply upward push to our subjective adventure, - and floor human wisdom? content material, cognizance and conception is an edited assortment, comprising 11 new contributions to the philosophy of brain, written by means of essentially the most promising younger philosophers within the united kingdom and eire.
Recognition is likely to be the main confusing challenge we people face in attempting to comprehend ourselves. right here, eighteen essays supply new angles at the topic. The individuals, who contain some of the best figures in philosophy of brain, speak about such valuable themes as intentionality, out of the ordinary content material, and the relevance of quantum mechanics to the research of cognizance.
- Real Natures and Familiar Objects
- Self-Knowing Agents
- Philosophical issues in psychiatry III: The Nature and Sources of Historical Change
- Locke (Oxford Readings in Philosophy)
- Williamson on Knowledge
Extra info for Self to Self: Selected Essays
I think that Kant’s mistake was to claim that we must act under the idea of freedom; what he should have said, I think, is that we must act under the idea of autonomy. Let me explain the difference between these concepts. ‘Autonomy’ is derived from the Greek word for self-rule or selfgovernance. Our behavior is autonomous when it is self-governed, in the sense that we ourselves are in control of it; it is not autonomous – or, as Kant would say, it is heteronomous – when it is controlled by something other than ourselves.
As we have seen, requirements that depend for their force on some external source of authority turn out to be escapable because the A Brief Introduction to Kantian Ethics 19 authority behind them can be questioned. S. ” And as we observed in the case of the desire to punch someone in the nose, this question demands a reason for acting. The authority we are questioning would be vindicated, in each case, by the production of a sufficient reason. What this observation suggests is that any purported source of practical authority depends on reasons for obeying it – and hence on the authority of reasons.
The requirement to act for reasons thus seems to come as close as any requirement can to having intrinsic authority, in the sense of being authoritative by virtue of what it requires. This requirement therefore comes as close as any requirement can to being inescapable. But remember that inescapability was supposed to be the hallmark of a moral obligation or duty: it was the essential element in our concept of a duty, from which we hoped that the content of our duty could be deduced. What we have now deduced is that the requirement that bears this mark of morality is the requirement to act for reasons; and so we seem to have arrived at the conclusion that “Act for reasons” is the content of our duty.